A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

Our thanks to Martin for this. He writes:

I thought it was the responsibility of the drinker not to get drunk, not the bartender’s.

Is it the responsibility of the local butcher that a person gets fat, for selling him/her the meat?

What has the world come to? women are not responsible for anything, yet have all the rights.

The gentleman culture really belongs to the dustbin of history by now.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this. The start of the piece:

The Army is to introduce ‘gender and age-neutral’ fitness tests, the Ministry of Defence has said.

They will replace the current assessments, which make allowances based on sex and age and see soldiers completing tasks including push-ups and sit-ups.

The new tests, which will come in next year, aim to ensure all close combat soldiers are physically prepared for the rigours of modern battle, said the MoD.

Field Army Sergeant Major Gavin Paton said yesterday: ‘I don’t care if you are a man or a woman, I don’t care what you do, and the enemy doesn’t either.’

You can be very sure that the new “fitness tests” will be set at a level at which more women “succeed”, as was the case with the Fire Service. The inevitable result will be a reduction in the average fitness of “close combat soldiers” over time, compromising the safety of all of them, men and women alike, in the event of conflicts, and increasing the likelihood of operational failure.

In 2013 we posted a piece from a fireman, Female firefighters – coming soon to a fire near you? Fingers crossed!. This is the model the British Army is keen to adopt. Madness. Utter madness.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

At last, some hilarious comedy on the BBC, albeit unplanned. Thank goodness for live television, otherwise we’d never have seen this gem.

Politics Live is the female-dominated successor to Daily Politics. Yesterday a BBC TV team was reporting from the Labour party conference, and needless to say much of the programme was occupied by the news of John McDonnell’s statement that the next party leader “must” be a woman. Some genius working for Politics Live came up with the idea of talking to conference attendees, asking them to select one cupcake from a selection, each bearing the images of one of the following – Rebecca Long-Bailey, Emily Thornberry, and Angela Rayner. People with a BBC licence can watch the exchange covered by this blog piece, on iPlayer, from 35:10, here.

The following conversation took place outside the Momentum stand, with a (female) interviewer and one of two young black women, who cites three black MPs in succession:

Interviewer: “Hi guys! We’re just asking people – it’s a very scientific survey – if the next leader is going to be a woman, which of these three candidates would you go far? (Two assistants displayed the range of cupcakes) You can have Emily Thornberry, Angela Rayner, or Rebecca Long-Bailey.

Woman: “Diane Abbott“.

Interviewer: “Oh, we don’t have Diane on a cake…”.

Woman: “Dawn Butler“.

Interviewer (starting to get visibly exasperated): “Yeah, we have limited cake options…”.

Woman: “Marsha de Cordova“.

Priceless. Simply priceless. A strong candidate for a Labour all-women shortlist, we feel.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

“Feminism is insanity” and should be classified as an “absolutely radical point of view.” said Vitaly Milonov, as he called for people propagating feminism to be prosecuted for up to five years.

More details in Buzzfeed.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

Our thanks to James for this in PR Week. It includes a link to a video (3:26) of some women at FlyBe. He writes:

There are two deliciously ironic parts in there:

1. One of the women says that “I didn’t have the degree or the technical skills stated on the job advert, but I got the job anyway, so don’t let it hold you back”
2. Another says “It’s all about getting girls at primary school to feel that they can apply to aviation and it’s not just for boys. Then all you need to worry about is getting the best person for the job, and not whether they’re male or female”

Beautifully, staggeringly ironic, and ill thought through.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in September 2018:

Enjoy (video, 12:04). The man covers the utterly woeful BBC TV show The Mash Report over 7:55 – 11:17. I was interviewed for the programme by a desperately unfunny American “comedian”, Desiree Burch, earlier this year – here (3:14). The BBC filmed us over a period of two hours, in an unheated room in London on a very cold day in February, and broadcast just 194 seconds of material. The laughter was, of course, “canned”. I’ve watched entire episodes of The Mash Report without laughing once.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in March 2013:

The day we never thought would arrive… has arrived. David Cameron has publicly criticised a woman. Only to defend another woman, it’s true, but it’s progress. Now there are so many obvious candidates, so who might she have been? Harriet Harman MP, for doing all in her power to drive through feminist agendas when Labour were in power, with no democratic mandate for doing so? Jo Swinson MP for her remarks about the alleged benefits of having more women in corporate boardrooms? EU Commissioner Viviane Reding, for the same reason, but across the EU?

Er, no. He’s publicly criticised the authoress Hilary Mantel for comparing the Duchess of Cambridge to a ‘shop window mannequin’. He’s sticking to the big issues of the day… the economy, challenges with the City, energy security, food adulteration, the financial and political crises affecting the EU, deciding policy with respect to military intervention in Syria… and the Duchess of Cambridge’s appearance. Unbelievable. Here’s the BBC piece on this hot news story:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21502937

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

I recently ordered a copy of David Cameron’s autobiography For the Record in connection with a book project I’m working on. The book is scheduled for publication in the autumn.

Cameron’s book was priced at £25 on publication (September 2019). Used copies in very good condition (possible new) can be bought for a little over £6.00 on Amazon. I bought a used copy, not wanting to give a penny to Cameron. The quality was “as new”, even if the author was, and remains, a five-star liberal plonker.

Before I turn to Cameron’s views on Hattie Harperson, what of Steve Hilton, his chief strategy advisor for many years? The two had studied PPE (Politics, Philosophy, Economics) at Oxford University together. When I worked as a business consultant at the Conservative Central Headquarters in London (2006-8) Hilton was widely considered as… how best to describe him?… a picnic short of a sandwich. I once had a meeting with Hilton and others, in which I expressed an opinion on something (I forget what). Hilton exploded, like a hysterical toddler.

We know what Hilton thought of Harperson from an interview the two of them had on The Andrew Marr Show in May 2015, which we have on our YouTube channel. The piece is here (video, 2:38). Hilton fawns over Harperson, it’s nothing short of excruciating.

And what of Cameron? Firstly, an aside. For those of us who admire Philip Davies MP and know the critical role he played in the early (and later) days of the campaign to withdraw the UK from the EU, it’s a disgrace that Cameron’s sole reference to Philip (p.332), is in the context of the three-line-whip on Conservative MPs to oppose a referendum on the EU, on 11 October, 2011. 81 Conservative MPs rebelled. Cameron’s words:

Lisbon [J4MB: The Lisbon Treaty] didn’t just rile the usual suspects. It also had an impact on the younger, liberal, what some might call the “Cameroon” wing of the party – reinforced by the fact that MPs were keen to reflect their constituents’ views. The bright and loyal MP Stuart Andrew came up to me and said that he backed my leadership, but because of the boundary review he would potentially be going for the same seat as anti-EU MP Philip Davies, and he had to rebel. I didn’t like it, but I understood.

The ringleaders were rapturous. They had brought about the biggest parliamentary rebellion on the issue of the EU for years…

Harperson, in stark contrast, is mentioned in seven sections of the book. On p.243:

Harriet Harman was effective. She asked questions about subjects she was passionate about, like equal pay and justice for rape victims. And she had a strong but likeable character, with a good sense of humour, which meant she managed to be persistent without ever sounding strident. [J4MB: Is Cameron confusing her with another woman?]

So there you have it. In common with Steve Hilton, his chief strategist, Cameron admired the most vile radical feminist of her generation. Cameron was no conservative.

The book is 732 pages long, the index alone 28 pages. The word “feminism” doesn’t appear in the index.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

Enjoy.

I spent a considerable time seeking (but failing) to get Baroness Brady to understand the difference between causation and correlation, and pointed to the evidence (from before 2012, and since) which demonstrates a clear causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial DECLINE. I would have had more success explaining correlation and causation to a cat. Cats are smart.

I thought at one point she was going to stamp her expensively-shod feet. It was hilarious, if a bit embarrassing, like watching a bad-tempered toddler in a store after you’ve told her she can’t have the sweets she wants.

Our discussion was a lengthy one, but only four minutes of content appeared in the final two-hour-long TV programme. Channel 5 reneged on their earlier agreement to allow us to post the piece on our YouTube channel, with copyright clearance, so I posted this (audio, 1:30) on our channel. I’m not sure that Brady uttered the words I added onto the image, but I imagine she must have thought them.

The comments after the article on the matter include this gem by Saf, a genius who evidently considers a man disagreeing with a woman “rude”, and advocates for violence against men who disagree with women:

#whydomenearnmorethanwomen omg someone slap that man! So rude!

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.