A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this. Too much information, to say the least. Has she also not shaven her legs for the past 50 years? If she has shaven them, how does she reconcile that with her feminist principles?

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

We need more female political forecasters.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Tonight the BBC broadcast the final of a series of University Challenge, in which ‘distinguished alumni’ of a number of universities were members of teams representing those universities. Being the BBC, the ‘distinguished alumni’ included prominent feminists who any person with an IQ in at least double digits would regard as blithering idiots. Needless to say, they appear very regularly on BBC TV and radio, where they are treated with reverence.

Two days ago we published a piece about one of the semi-finals, in which Special Snowflake (aka Laura Bates) performed so woefully that had she been replaced by a pot plant, her team would not have scored fewer points.

Tonight the BBC broadcast the final, with Sophie ‘Doughnuts’ Walker, leader of the Wimmin’s Equality Party, captaining the team from Reading. Three of her four team members, including herself, were token women. One of them, Pippa Greenwood, didn’t attempt to answer even one question. Katy Brand, a comedienne, ably and humorously captained the team representing Keble College, Oxford. Two of her team members were token women.

Katy Brand’s team, which had beaten Laura Bates’s team in the semi-final, beat Sophie Walker’s team by 240 points to nil. Had every member of Walker’s team been replaced by pot plants, the team would not have scored fewer points. At least the plants wouldn’t have answered any questions incorrectly. The programme is on BBC iPlayer for the next 30 days – here – you’ll need a BBC licence to watch it.

We’ve produced a detailed analysis of the programme – here. It turns out this blog’s software cannot link to Excel files, but if anyone wants the original Excel file, please contact us (info@j4mb.org.uk). The link we’ve provided is to a PDF, and possibly rather confusing, as it breaks up the Excel spreadsheet into individual pages.

So, how many points did the individual members of Katy Brand’s team score?

Frank Cottrell-Boyce: 140
Paul Johnson: 45
Katie Brand: 30
Anne-Marie Imafidon: 15
Unclear who answered the question correctly: 10

Frank Cottrell-Boyce scored more than 3x that of all five female contestants combined, while Paul Johnson equalled their points.

Of the 15 points scored by Anne-Marie Imafidon, 10 points were for identifying Nigeria as the country in which a number of cities are located. Paxman starts reading out the question at 7:04. Imafidon’s father emigrated from Nigeria, and she appeared sheepish in answering the question – her expression read, ‘Thanks for the gift, Jeremy!’ – and the chance of any other contestants knowing the answer to the question was surely very low. Without that ‘gift’ to her, both of the men on Katy Brand’s team would have earned more points than all five female contestants combined.

While the winning team was gender-balanced, the men scored at least 77 per cent of the team’s points. Frank Cottrell-Boyce alone scored at least 58 per cent of them.

We can be sure what the response of feminists will be to all this:

Women are strong!

Women are amazing!!

Women can do anything men can do!!!

We need a minimum quota for female contestants on quiz shows.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

A tip of the hat to Guido Fawkes for this (video, 1:00).

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this. What is the proportion of rich men handing over half their fortunes to their ex-wives, to the number of rich women handing over half their fortunes to their ex-husbands? It must be enormous, because of women’s hypergamy. Tellingly, in this case the woman made her fortune over the course of the marriage – she wouldn’t have married a man with so much less money than her (most demand for prenup contracts comes from well-off women). Money must never flow from women to men, regardless of the circumstances. That’s totally the wrong sort of equality.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Our thanks to Martin for this. The piece includes a video of the silly woman assaulting the man who had the nerve to touch one of her Special Snowflake breasts for a moment. We look forward to men removing their trousers and underwear and swinging their genitalia around in the vicinity of this woman, and seeing if the defence she employs – the right to wear what you want – applies to men, too.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

A piece in The Guardian. The start:

The British army has been accused of bowing to political correctness after launching a campaign to recruit more people from a diversity of genders, sexualities, ethnicities and faiths.

It has also been criticised for appearing to mislead recruits by suggesting the army offers help for those with mental health problems.

In a series of animations released on social media, the campaign positively answers questions such as “Can I be gay in the army?” and “What if I get emotional in the army?”. [J4MB emphasis – hmm, which cohort of people might ask THAT question?]

Later in the piece:

Gen Nick Carter, the chief of the general staff, said the army needed to change how it recruited and looked after trainees. Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he denied claims that the “This is belonging 2018” campaign showed the army had “gone soft”.

“We are getting new types of applicant, that’s why we need to adjust the approach we are using to how we nurture them into the army,” he said. “This campaign is a recognition that we don’t have a fully manned army at the moment, [J4MB emphasis] that the demography of our country has changed, and that we need to reach out to a broader community in order to man [J4MB: ‘man’? Arrest this man for thoughtcrime!] that army with the right talent.

“Our tradition cohort would have been white, male, Caucasian 16- to 25-year-olds, and there are not as many of those around as there once were. [J4MB: Can someone please explain how the claim in bold type can POSSIBLY be true?] It is entirely appropriate for us therefore to try and reach out to a much broader base to get the talent we need in order to sustain that combat effectiveness.”

Cue laughter from Russian and Chinese military personnel. What would have happened if half the troops in the Army, Navy, and Air Force on D-Day had been women? We’d all be speaking German today, and life’s difficult enough as it is.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Our thanks to Martin for this. An extract:

According to Bernardino, her work is a comment on human perception and her belief in the potential of art to encourage social change.

According to Buchanan, she’s a talentless narcissistic blithering idiot.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in January 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this triumph of male ingenuity. It makes one proud to be a man.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.