A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

A very silly piece in iNews. The (female) journalist repeats the absurd feminist lie that Philip Davies is a self-proclaimed ‘meninist’, a term invented by particularly ignorant feminists who are too blinkered to understand why there will never be a male equivalent of feminism. Davies doesn’t even self-identify as a Men’s Rights Advocate.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Cambridge and Oxford universities are openly and unashamedly working to deliver equality of gender outcomes in degree grades (not in degree numbers of course, because 60% of degrees are awarded to women, so there’s no problem to be addressed.) Our thanks to Jeff for this. The start of the piece:

Cambridge academics are being discouraged from using terms such as genius, brilliant or flair in feedback for fear of alienating female students.

It is one of a series of moves lecturers say will help women – including changing exams and even removing portraits of men from the library.

Dr Lucy Delap, lecturer in modern British history, said ‘vague talk of genius, brilliance [and] flair carries assumptions of gender inequality’. She said some women ‘don’t find it very easy to project themselves into those categories’. [J4MB: Hmm, might the same be true for ‘some men’?]

Some female students suffered ‘imposter syndrome’ – where they feel they don’t belong – in a ‘male-dominated’ environment, said the academic. Dr Delap revealed exams were being overhauled in a bid to tackle a ‘gender differential’ which sees women outshone.

This could mean more coursework, take-home exams, [J4MB: a cheat’s charter] group work or a portfolio of essays. [J4MB: Basically, anything and everything which can help raise the grades of women relative to men, because vagina.]

Later in the piece:

In 2015-16, 31 per cent of women gained firsts in history at Cambridge compared with 39 per cent of men. A university spokesman said it was reviewing subjects to see how it could address ‘variations’ between different groups. [J4MB: Presumably a key explanation of why a higher proportion of men than women get firsts is precisely the same as in other areas in which men and women compete. More men than women are ‘work-centred’, i.e. they have a strong work orientation – Dr Hakim’s Preference Theory (2000)]

Feminists demand ‘variations between different groups’ be stamped out at all costs, needless to say. Other than in areas such as healthcare provision, workplace deaths, killing unborn children, genital mutilation, access to children, support for domestic violence victims, homelessness, prison sentencing… you know, the small stuff.

Lucy Delap’s webpage at the University of Cambridge is here. Her apparent inability to smile even for a moment for an official photograph strongly suggests she’s a feminist, and as a feminist ‘academic’, by definition a taxpayer-funded parasite. Her biography on the same page confirms it:

Lucy Delap is a historian of modern Britain, with a particular interest in gender history, the history of feminism…

Her Amazon author page is here.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Our thanks to Jeff for this piece by two female BBC journalists. Why does it so often take two women to do the work of one man? When I was a schoolboy 40+ years ago, most teachers were men, and there was no need for Teaching Assistants. Since the time that most teachers were women, Teaching Assistants have been required – and needless to say, that line of work is close to being a female monopoly. I digress.

From the article:

Ivan Peter Khodabakhsh, chief executive of the Ladies European (golf) Tour, said he was still striving for parity in prize money.

“We are extremely proud of the significant strides which have been made in redressing the gender imbalance in prize money across the whole of sport over the last three years,” he told BBC Sport.

“Knowing the reality in the market, however, I would question that 80% of sports have equal prize money. We believe there is still a significant gap between the treatment of men’s and women’s events. More needs to be done from a social perspective to improve the perception of women’s sport and the financial rewards.” [J4MB: WHY does more need to be done?]…

European Solheim Cup captain Annika Sorenstam said women’s golf was “doing a good job” but that players would continue to “work hard” to address the disparity.

She added: “Sport is a mirror of the business world. [J4MB: No, it’s not. What an eye-wateringly stupid comparison.] Unfortunately a lot of women in the business world don’t always get paid the same as a man in the same role. [J4MB: No evidence is provided to back this assertion, possibly because it’s baseless.] We just have to continue to fight for it and hope they pay by performance and not by gender.” [J4MB: Payment by performance in sport would inevitably mean paying women less.]

She also stressed it was important to consider the impact of sponsorship, which can be higher in men’s sport because it features more prominently on television. [J4MB: It features more prominently on television because it’s more exciting and watchable, and therefore draws higher audiences, and in turn higher sponsorship money. What does Ms Sorenstam imagine will happen when people ‘consider the impact of sponsorship’?]…

England’s former world squash number one Laura Massaro has benefited from squash’s decision to reward male and female players equally from this year and said sports women should be vocal in their fight for equality.

“It frustrated me that we played the same number of games [J4MB: So Ms Massaro would agree that in tennis, where women play fewer games than men, they should get lesser prize money? Ha.] and put in the same amount of training and effort as the men but because we may have been perceived as playing at a slightly lower level to the men [J4MB: Ms Massaro is clearly preparing for a future career as a stand-up comedienne] we weren’t paid the same,” the 33-year-old told BBC Sport.

Is there not one sports journalist in the world pointing out the gross unfairness of equal prize money?

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Our thanks to Ian for this.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Gender equality in action.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Lunacy in France. An extract:

In the interview, Ms Schiappa suggested that part of the problem was male attitudes. “Men feel it’s acceptable: they’re being ‘the French lover’.”

“It’s that moment when a man is walking behind a woman, talking to her, and the woman can do nothing, because she’s alone. [J4MB: Could she not talk to the man? I know feminists are dumb, but this is ridiculous.]

Ms Schiappa expressed concern that women who were sexually assaulted blamed themselves. Only a large fine would act as a deterrent – a smaller amount would only be seen as “a bit humiliating,” she said.

Of course not only should men not speak to women on their own, their gaze should not fall upon them, unless solicited. In 2013 I suggested a solution to the ‘problem’ of men looking at women – here.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

Please sign.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

Mike Stephenson (Dr RandomerCam) is a comic genius who’ll be appearing at the Messages 4 Men conference on 14 November. His latest video is Salt of the Earth (FULL VIDEO) (video, 41:30).

If you’re pushed for time, at 17:43 there’s a Venezuela / Johnny B Goode thing. Hilarious. Enjoy, then send him a donation if you can afford it, as I just have. Thanks.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

Enjoy.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in June 2017:

Our thanks to Mike P for this. The end of the piece:

Williams had admitted in the past that she’d probably lose to a male champion in ten minutes or less.

When interviewed on ‘Late Night with David Letterman’ four years ago, she said: ‘For me, men’s tennis and women’s tennis are completely, almost, two separate sports.

‘If I were to to play Andy Murray, I would lose 6-0, 6-0 in five to six minutes, maybe ten minutes. No, it’s true. It’s a completely different sport.

‘The men are a lot faster and they serve harder, they hit harder. It’s just a different game. I love to play women’s tennis. I only want to play girls, because I don’t want to be embarrassed.’

What Serena Williams should be embarrassed about is earning the same prize money (e.g. at Wimbledon) as the male prize winners, whilst only playing as well as the #700 male seed. Like all her colleagues, she’s a shameless parasite on the men’s game.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.