A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Our thanks to Mike T for this (video, 16:24). At 15:35 there’s a short extract from an episode of The Stephen Nolan Show on BBC Radio Ulster, on which Kate Smurthwaite and I appeared some time ago. After this clip there’s one of the TV interview during which Peter Lloyd effortlessly sent her crazy with just a few words. We’ve never known ‘comedian’ Smurfwit ever respond to any provocation with a humorous response. I’ve had broken bones I found funnier than her.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Whenever merit can be judged subjectively in mixed-gender competitions, women “win” awards and prizes far more often than when merit can be judged objectively (when they never win them). To ensure the former, we have feminist manipulation such as this. From the Mangina Booker website:

2018 marks the 50^th anniversary of the launch of The Man Booker Prize. To celebrate this landmark, the Booker Prize Foundation is putting 50 years of Booker-winning titles head-to-head in a competition for the Golden Man Booker prize, a one-off award crowning the best work of fiction from the last five decades of the prize.

Now, the five judges – writer and editor Robert McCrum, poet Lemn Sissay MBE, novelist Kamila Shamsie, broadcaster and novelist Simon Mayo, and poet Hollie McNish – have completed the unenviably difficult task of narrowing down five decades of prize-winning fiction to just five shortlisted titles. But the final choice is down to readers who now have the chance to participate in a month-long vote to determine the overall winner, announced at the Man Booker 50 Festival on 8 July 2018.

The question is, which will get your Golden Man Booker vote?

We are being asked to believe that the authorship of the best winning books from the past five decades run like this:

1970s – author

1980s – authoress

1990s – author

2000s – authoress

2010s – author

We can safely predict that feminists will whip up women to vote for the two books written by women. What a pathetic spectacle the announcement of a female “winner” will be.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Outrageous.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for this. Quelle surprise. The end of the piece:

She is understood to have been one of just three women who applied to join the RAF Regiment and the only one considered fit enough [J4MB emphasis. Considered fit enough by who, and on what grounds? The person is evidently utterly incompetent, given the woman threw the towel in after just two weeks into an 18-week course.] to start the course at RAF Honington alongside 44 men.

A source at the base said: ‘Even though she was way off the pace of most of the men, [J4MB emphasis] she gained a lot of people’s respect. She tried her best [J4MB: “Trying your best” will be the critical success factor in the next war Britain fights, hopefully] and was honest enough to admit the course was too tough for her. [J4MB: “Honest enough to admit”. What alternative did she have? Denying the bleedin’ obvious?]

‘She was a bit isolated outside training hours because she lived apart from everyone else. [J4MB: A bit isolated? Oh dear. How sad. Never mind. The lesson to be learned is obvious. The RAF – and the Army and Navy – must construct social clubs so that real (male) combatants and pretend (female) combatants can mix outside training hours, so the latter can get some sexual harassment cases in, and hit the jackpot at taxpayers’ expense.]

‘There was a lot of secrecy surrounding her participation. The guys were surprised to see her. There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. [J4MB emphasis – how might they have “helped”, one wonders.] I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

A tip of the hat to Andy, the man behind the “Misandry Abounds” / “Men Hating Abounds” website, for this.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

David Solway’s excellent article on the innate feminist lack of humour.

And while we’re on the subject, why not take another look at Peter Lloyd’s classic triggering of Kate Smurthwaite?

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Daily Mail caption: Will Norman, Sadiq Khan’s new cycling tsar wants to diversify cycling  to stop London’s cycling routes being overwhelmed by middle class men

Our thanks to a number of supporters for this. So, why are men outnumbering women in this area? The answer is work ethic, a preparedness to do things which are physically and/or mentally challenging. Go to any park and see what the ratio of men and women (or boys and girls) exercising or playing sports are. It’s rarely less than 10:1, sometimes 20:1. No taxpayer-funded initiatives will ever change that reality, though they may provide employment for otherwise unemployable SJWs.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Some reflections (video, 3:25) from a Swedish man on Bitchute.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

James Cameron has criticised the final scene in Ridley Scott’s ‘Alien’ for objectifying Sigourney Weaver’s character, Ripley.

Weaver’s keennes to participate in the scene is apparently an irrelevance to him, as are the fairly obvious reasons that the decision to strip Weaver down to her underwear may have been taken (to emphasise her belief that she’s safe – making the appearance of the Xenomorph more surprising – and to leave her as vulnerable as possible).

It’s a great scene in a great film but “feminism ruins everything” (in the words of 6oodfella). My only hope is that in pushing this agenda, representations of sexuality that heterosexual men are likely to enjoy will become subversive… And, that this will lead to increasing courage and creativity in the cultural sector which will push the boundaries, imposed by feminist aggression, both in the making of art and in the public politics of the auteurs.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.

A piece published on the website of Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them), the political party of which I’m the chairman, in May 2018:

Our thanks to Mike P for another piece for the “You couldn’t make this s*** up!” file.

Please support Mike Buchanan’s work on Patreon. Thank you.